Instead of being seen as a means of earning, it is seen as a way of spending time and resources. It marks a transition far greater than the often-described shift from a Fordist to post-Fordist economy.

The shift from work to occupation applies in the most different areas of contemporary daily activity. It is not centered on a producer/worker, but includes consumers, reproducers, even destroyers, time-wasters, and bystanders-in essence, anybody seeking distraction or engagement. It has no temporal framework except the passing of time itself. An occupation doesn’t necessarily assume remuneration either, since the process is thought to contain its own gratification. As such, it knows no traditional alienation, nor any corresponding idea of subjectivity. It also produces a subject by means of alienation.Īn occupation is not hinged on any result it has no necessary conclusion. Work is primarily seen as a means to an end: a product, a reward, or a wage. If we think of work as labor, it implies a beginning, a producer, and eventually a result. The economic framework, but also its implications for space and temporality. In fact, almost everything changes on the way from work to occupation. This change in terminology may look trivial. Lets start with a simple proposition: what used to be work has increasingly been turned into occupation. Keep doing this for one month, every day. You are allowed to move around, to pan and zoom. Record whatever you see for a couple of seconds. I want you to take out your mobile phone.

Hito steyerl pattern discrimination